1 Brilliant Way You Can Beat the Stock Market Experts in 2025 and Beyond

There’s hardly any arguing with the fact that investing in the stock market is one of the best ways to build wealth. However, it can all feel so intimidating and complex at first.

You are watching: 1 Brilliant Way You Can Beat the Stock Market Experts in 2025 and Beyond

Making matters worse is that the professionals, who the average investor might turn to for guidance, have poor track records. In the past decade, an alarming 85% of U.S.-based active fund managers underperformed the broader S&P 500. Those who invest in these funds are essentially paying for unsatisfactory results.

There’s reason to be hopeful, though. In fact, you, the average investor, can adopt a ridiculously simple strategy to beat these experts.

Set it and forget it

The best course of action for the average investor, if the goal is to outperform the pros, is to buy an investment vehicle that tracks the performance of the overall S&P 500 index. This benchmark consists of 500 large and profitable American businesses in all sectors of the economy.

See more : Stock Market Today: Muted Inflation Data Sparks Relief Rally

Investors can choose from popular index funds offered by reputable firms, such as the Fidelity 500 Index Fund or the Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund. There are exchange-traded funds, too, like the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF or the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF. All of these are low-cost options.

Historically, this has been a worthwhile bet to make. The S&P 500 index has produced a total average annual return (a figure that includes dividends) of 10.3% since 1926. This means that had you invested $1,000 30 years ago, that position would be worth more than $19,000 today.

However, investors can supercharge their returns by also investing fresh cash at regular intervals, a strategy known as dollar-cost averaging (DCA). Let’s say you invested $1,000 in an S&P 500 fund 30 years ago, but then you also invested $50 per month during that period of time. Today, your position would be worth a jaw-dropping $130,000. Even the great Warren Buffett supports this investment approach for most people.

Adopting a DCA approach essentially involves automating the investing process. Investors can avoid spending hours researching financial statements and competitive dynamics, and there’s no need to make complex decisions about what to buy and sell. The simplicity is actually a key feature for long-term success that can help your portfolio perform better than the vast majority of professional fund managers out there.

Reasons for poor performance

It’s strange to think that such an easy-to-understand and effortless strategy can do so well. I believe it’s worthwhile to consider two key factors that could be leading to such disappointing results for the experts.

See more : FASB Seeks Feedback on Clarification to Interim Effective Date for Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses Standard

One area that deserves some blame is the fees that these fund managers charge. For example, more sophisticated hedge funds typically charge a flat management fee of 2%, coupled with a performance fee that takes 20% of annual profits. It’s not difficult to realize that over time, a large chunk of client capital in these funds gets eaten up by fees.

I also think over-diversification is a problem that results in poor returns. The average mutual fund owns more than 100 different stocks. At this point, it looks like the ultimate goal for these professionals is minimizing volatility, instead of maximizing long-term gains.

It makes zero sense to me why these highly educated professionals would choose to allocate money to their 50th- or 100th-best idea when they could simply invest all their capital into the top 20 or 30, for example. Running a more concentrated book focused on the highest-quality stock picks would probably be a huge benefit.

This should all nudge the average investor, one who’s looking to build wealth in the stock market and outperform the experts, to choose a passive strategy.